Tag Archives: Oscar

RRR

RRR‘s Director and DP Talk Shoot, Post, Visual Effects

By Iain Blair

RRR is an Indian superhero movie and an international hit, thanks to its story, VFX and blend of emotion and action.

S.S. Rajamouli on-set (center)

Directed and co-written by S.S. Rajamouli and shot by his longtime cinematographer, KK Senthil Kumar, RRR (which stands for Rise, Roar, Revolt) tells the “true” story of two guerrilla fighters — Komaram Bheem and Alluri Sitarama Raju – who took on the British Raj in the 1920s. It features a cast of thousands and an even bigger army of post and VFX teams behind the scenes.

The long collaboration between the director and cinematographer goes back some two decades. I talked with them about making the ambitious film, which is getting its fair share of Oscar buzz, the challenges of the shoot and dealing with post and VFX.

S.S. Rajamouli (left)

What sort of film did you set out to make, and how far did it push the envelope for you?
S.S. Rajamouli: I want my films to blow audiences away with extraordinary action scenes and set pieces, so we really pushed all that, but we also need to have very strong emotional characters. That’s what I set out to do on this, and I think we succeeded.

Can you talk about integrating post and all the VFX?
Rajamouli: We began right at the start of prep. The big challenge on this was the huge volume of things – the sheer number of people involved in all departments, the huge amount of VFX shots, all the data and so on. It was easy to get lost in all that and lose sight of what we were trying to do in terms of the story and characters.

This is your eighth film with your DP, KK Senthil Kumar. Talk about what he brings to the party.
Rajamouli: He brings a sense of calm to the set. I tend to jump around, trying to see what I need to do next, and the rest of the team follows my emotional outbursts. If I’m strong, the unit’s strong. If I’m dull, they’re dull. They all take after me. But Senthil is the one guy who doesn’t care about the director. He only cares about the film and how to get the shot done. He’d never compromise, so there’s all that trust, and that’s very important.

How tough was the shoot?
Rajamouli: It was very tough, but it helped that we had a lot of experience dealing with big productions with lots of extras and locations and costumes and so on. What made this so challenging was all the VFX and animation sequences, especially the ones with animals interacting with humans on different levels.

Is it true it took several years to shoot?
Rajamouli: It’s true. We originally planned for two years, including prep and all the post work, but because of COVID, we took another two years to complete it all, so it was about a year of shooting spread out over two years, and four years total to complete the film.

That must be some kind of record, right?
Rajamouli: No, before this we did this two-part series, Baahubali 1 and 2, which took us five years to do, so this was much shorter. (Laughs)

Tell us about post. Where did you do it?
Rajamouli: We did 85% of it at Annapurna Studios in Hyderabad, my hometown, including all the editing, the sound and Atmos mix, some of the VFX and the DI.

A. Sreekar Prasad cut this. What were the main editing challenges?
Rajamouli: We had assistants, of course, but he was the only editor. He’s very experienced, and the main editing he did was not on the film so much but on the script. I gave him the script before we began shooting, and he had a lot of suggestions and ideas that were very helpful. We talked a lot about shots, how long they should be and so on, but more than that, we focused on the characters and their development. Then the moment I start shooting, I start editing.

My team does the edit after a few days of shooting, and we send the rushes to the editor, so by the time we complete a particular sequence, 80% of it is already cut. Then that’s sent off to the VFX team. That’s the process.

There are a lot of amazing VFX. Who did them, and what was entailed?
Rajamouli: There are so many that I lost count. There are well over 2,000. VFX supervisor V. Srinivas Mohan helped oversee shots coming in from all over the world, as we had so many companies working on it, including MPC, Digital Domain, Red Chillies, Firefly, ReDefine, Craft VFX, Mind Visions, Knack Studios, Betta VFX, Makuta, DNeg and several others.

It was a huge job. For instance, that sequence where all the tigers and wild animals escape happens right before the intermission, and it was the most complicated sequence I’ve ever shot. It took over 50 days to plan, which is more prep and previz and planning than you’d do on an entire normal, medium-sized film. And we had over 2,000 extras with different sets of costumes.

Just to get certain elements, like the pipes moving like snakes, took 10 days just to prep. And there were no real animals used in the sequence. It was all VFX. But in big set pieces, like the train crashing into the river, we used a lot of miniatures combined with VFX and real fire and cleverly mixed it all to make it look seamless.

Did it turn out the way you first envisioned it?
Rajamouli: Yes, but we’ve been very surprised by the big reaction to it around the world. I make films for the Indian market, which is very big, but audiences everywhere have really embraced it. I’m very happy about it.

Cinematography

RRR

K.K. Senthil Kumar, ISC

Senthil, how long was prep?
K.K. Senthil Kumar: It took about a year, and we did a lot of camera tests and lens tests. This is one of the biggest films ever made in India, and I wanted to capture that epic quality and make it a really immersive experience for the audience. ARRI had just come out with the new Alexa LF, and it was perfect for us. This was the very first Indian film to be shot on large format.

I shot with ARRI Signature Primes, which are some of the sharpest lenses you’ll ever find. It’s almost like a 3D feel, and that combination of the LF and the ultra-sharp lenses meant that the film could be screened in a wide range of formats, from Dolby Vision to IMAX and 3D.

You must have used a lot of cameras on this?
Kumar: No, I generally just shot with one Alexa LF, which I operate myself. For the big action sequences, we used maybe two, but a maximum of three, at any one time.

I assume you did a lot of previz?
Kumar: Yes, a lot, especially for all the big action sequences, including the chase one in the forest with the tiger, when we introduce Bheem. That was one of the first we previz’d. Then we did the train blast sequence on the river. Then the big sequence that takes place right before the interval in the middle of the film, when Bheem lets all these wild animals escape from a truck, and we have tigers and leopards flying through the air and attacking the British soldiers.

We also had to do a lot of stunt viz, as this was such a huge production, and everyone had to know what was going on and understand the storyboarding and previz and how all the CGI worked with all that. 

This is your eighth film together. Talk about the look you and SSR went for, especially as a lot of it is set at night.
Kumar: We’ve been working together for nearly 20 years now. We did our first film back in 2003, and since then they’ve been getting bigger and bigger and more complicated. My first goal for this was to make it look authentic and not fake in any way.

I knew what I wanted in terms of the look, but the way I work is just to shoot it all clean and then spend a lot of time in post and grading, working on the image and developing the look. I have a DIT on-set, but I do nearly all the coloring and manipulation in the DI, not on location.

RRR

K.K. Senthil Kumar

How did you even keep track of your work on such a long schedule?
Kumar: We keep a continuity book for every shot with every detail — where the camera is placed, its height, how it’s placed, exposure, focus, all the lighting. That way, if for some reason we need to redo the shot later as a pickup or for CG plates, we know exactly what we did originally and can then keep the continuity.

What about the DI? Who was the colorist, and how closely did you work with them?
Kumar: We did all the grading in Hyderabad at Annapurna Studios with colorist Shiva Kumar. I show Rajamouli what we’re doing, and he may have a few notes, but he basically leaves the DI up to me. That took about eight months, and there was a lot of coordination with all the VFX teams as the shots came in.

So all the back and forth with them is why it took so long, but it turned out looking great. I’m very happy with the way it looks.


Industry insider Iain Blair has been interviewing the biggest directors in Hollywood and around the world for years. He is a regular contributor to Variety and has written for such outlets as Reuters, The Chicago Tribune, The Los Angeles Times and the Boston Globe.

Guillaume Rocheron

Oscar Winner Guillaume Rocheron Joins DNeg as VFX Supervisor

DNeg, a VFX and animation studio working in feature film, television and multiplatform content, has added Guillaume Rocheron as visual effects supervisor. The multiple Oscar- and BAFTA-winning supervisor joins DNeg with more than two decades of experience. He is based at the company’s Los Angeles studio.

Rocheron’s list of production VFX supervisor credits includes Jordan Peele’s Nope, Sam Mendes’ 1917, Michael Dougherty’s Godzilla: King of the Monsters and Rupert Sanders’ Ghost in the Shell. More recently, he has overseen the visual effects work for Alejandro G. Iñárritu’s Bardo: False Chronicle of a Handful of Truths, which will release on Netflix on December 16.

In 2020, Rocheron was honored with an Oscar and a BAFTA for his work on 1917, for which he and his teams created long, seamless shots that maintained the illusion of the whole two-hour movie being filmed in one continuous take. He had previously taken home an Oscar, a BAFTA and a Visual Effects Society (VES) Award for his work on Ang Lee’s Life of Pi.

“As a widely respected and highly admired supervisor, Guillaume has produced some extraordinary work over the course of his career — he is a supervisor who always pushes the envelope and knows how to get the very best from his teams,” says Namit Malhotra, DNeg chairman/CEO. “2023 will be a thrilling year for DNeg, with some big opportunities on the horizon, and I am excited to have Guillaume onboard as part of our senior creative team to help chart the course for DNeg through next year and beyond.”

“It’s been incredible to see how DNeg has evolved over the last few years, and to see how Namit and his team have been transforming the company into a home for filmmakers to create amazing visual effects,” says Rocheron. “I am excited to embark on this collaboration with DNeg’s outstanding artists, engineers and technicians and to join a global team that includes so many outstanding supervisors. DNeg’s filmmaker-oriented mentality, focus on innovation and commitment to its people are all very appealing to me.”

 

Craig Gillespie on directing I, Tonya

By Iain Blair

If you haven’t seen I, Tonya, the latest dark comedy from Aussie director Craig Gillespie (Lars and the Real Girl), get your skates on and rush over to the nearest cineplex for a real treat.

This festival fave, which is deservedly getting a lot of awards attention (it just earned three Golden Globe noms and a host of others), is based on the unbelievable but true events surrounding infamous American figure skater Tonya Harding and one of the most sensational scandals in sports history. Though Harding was the first American woman to complete a triple axel in competition, her legacy was forever tarnished by her association with an infamous, ill-conceived and even more poorly executed attack on fellow Olympic competitor Nancy Kerrigan.

Craig Gillespie on set with Margot Robbie.

Featuring an iconic turn by Margot Robbie as the fiery Harding, a mustachioed Sebastian Stan as her impetuous ex-husband Jeff Gillooly and a tour de force performance from Allison Janney as her acid-tongued mother, the film is a piercing portrayal of Harding’s life and career in all of its unchecked –– and checkered –– glory.

Gillespie, who worked as an award-winning commercial director for 15 years before making his feature debut with 2007’s Mr. Woodcock, and whose credits include Million Dollar Arm and Fright Night, once again uses his irreverent, offbeat comedy sense to dramatize a cautionary tale about talent, ambition, celebrity, class, bad perms and domestic abuse — all stuffed with larger-than-life characters and wacky, unreliable narrators.

I recently talked with Gillespie about making the film and the surrounding awards buzz.

What was the appeal of this story for you? It seems like the perfect fit for your sensibility.
You’re right. The script by Steven Rogers, who did Stepmom, was just amazing. It felt like the most “me” project since Lars. In some ways it’s even more me, with so much dark humor in the script. And when I heard Margot was attached, I was really intrigued as she has the range to do all the comedy and drama. It was bizarre to read the script, because it was so tight and read like it was already edited, with all the scenes lined up.

Did it change much?
The main change was giving myself freedom editorially. The script had a very unconventional approach, and originally there was a lot more of the talking heads. I sat down with my DP (Nicolas Karakatsanis) and figured out how we could take every opportunity to shoot those scenes without the talking heads, so we could use voiceover and music instead to give it more energy. I designed specific camera moves so we could carry voiceover or music going into those scenes, or possibly leaving them.

There’s a lot of comedy, but also some very serious stuff, like the domestic abuse and battery. That must have also been a bit of a tightrope to walk?
It was. In terms of dealing with the tone, it was one of the biggest challenges, and I didn’t want to judge the characters or just make fun of them, which would have been too easy. There’s comedy, but you also see that, with the domestic violence, Tonya’s kind of immune to it. She’s desensitized to it, and I felt that that also gave more insight into her character. I also shot those scenes both ways too, so I had a choice in the editing. And then it changes to Jeff’s point-of-view, and he breaks the fourth wall about half-way through the movie, so there was a lot to work with in the edit.

I would have never thought of Margot Robbie as Tonya. What did she bring to the role?
Everything. It’s such a tightrope to walk in terms of the tone, and she ages from 15 to 46, so there are all the different ages and scenes that are absurdly dark and funny, and scenes that are incredibly emotional. It was the whole kitchen sink, but I knew that Margot could navigate that tricky dance between the humor and the drama, and also keep it grounded and not wink at the audience, and she’s brilliant in the role.

How much skating did she do?
A lot. She trained so hard for five months, four days a week, and it was hard as she’d never figure skated before. In the end, she did a lot of the skating and then for the really difficult moves we used VFX to enhance them. I actually had no idea the huge amount of prep she did, studying every bit of footage out there to get her speech patterns and mannerisms, down to the different ages and the way she sounded at those different ages, and doing scenes with no make-up and bad hair and so on. There was nothing she wasn’t up for. We both met Tonya in person, so that helped too.

Allison Janney is equally phenomenal.
Steve actually wrote the role for her. She’s so ferocious and fearless when you consider some of her dialogue is so vile. There were days when she’d say, “Do I have to say the ‘c’ word again?” And I’d say, “Yeah, you do.” But she delivered it all in a way where you still like her.

I heard it was a very fast shoot. How tough was it?
Very. We did it in just 31 days, and the original script had 265 scenes, and we then added a few. It’s probably the fastest, most intense schedule I’ve ever had, but I was so lucky in that my cast was so well-prepared.

Do you like post?
I really love it. It’s the most fun part of the whole filmmaking process for me, and I love the first few weeks where you’re editing and finding the film and then the pace and tone and rhythm and so on. It’s the most creative part for me.

Where did you do the post?
We did it all at Harbor Post in New York.

The film was edited by your long-time editor Tatiana Riegel. What were the biggest editing challenges?
We cut for five or six months, and finding the right tone was key. But we’re so in tune that there are scenes I never touched after her first assembly. The scene between Tonya and her mother in the diner? I never changed anything, as she has such an instinctive balance of tone. We have an amazing shorthand now. I actually thought it might be a quite complicated edit, as the story jumps around so much, but we’d planned it all out so much that I did my first cut in under a month after we wrapped.

How many visual effects shots are there in the film?
We had about 120, mainly for the skating sequences, and Eight VFX did them all. I’ve used them a lot on my commercials, and they always have my back, and we had a very tight budget. We got lucky as our Steadicam operator could skate, but then we had to add in crowds to all the great shots, and we had about 60 stage replacements where we shot on bluescreen, so we ended up doubling the amount of VFX shots we needed.

Can you talk about the importance of music and sound to you as a filmmaker?
They’re crucial, and this is the first time I’ve posted a movie with a lot of stuff already in mind. I usually figure it out as I go in post. The closest things I could find in terms of structure were To Die For and Goodfellas, which goes through a lot of scenes very quickly — especially in the first half — with just voiceover and music. I designed a lot of shots around the music, such as “Devil Woman” and Chicago’s “25 Or 6 To 4,” and it was a really fun way to work. We mixed at Harbor.

The film has a great look. Talk about the DI and how that process helped?
We did it at Company 3 in New York with colorist Tom Poole. We shot on film, and Tom and the DP worked on it for a while and then I came in, and I love the look.

What’s next?
I’m looking for the right project. There’s nothing lined up.

Do you plan to keep shooting commercials?
Definitely. It’s a nice luxury to have because it’s something you can just jump into it for a short project. And you get to work with some of the greatest DPs in the whole business and try out different gear and experiment, and then bring that to the next movie. So I’ll keep doing both.


Industry insider Iain Blair has been interviewing the biggest directors in Hollywood and around the world for years. He is a regular contributor to Variety and has written for such outlets as Reuters, The Chicago Tribune, The Los Angeles Times and the Boston Globe.

The A-List: Jackie and Neruda director Pablo Larraín

By Iain Blair

Chilean director Pablo Larraín has been hailed as one of the most ambitious, iconoclastic, daring — and important — political filmmakers of his generation thanks to such films as No, a drama about the 1988 plebiscite that brought an end to the Pinochet era; Tony Manero, about a man obsessed with John Travolta’s disco dancing character from Saturday Night Fever; and The Club, a drama about disgraced priests.

iain-and-pablo

Writer Iain Blair and director Pablo Larraín.

He’s also one of the hardest-working directors in the business, with two major releases out before Christmas. First up is Fox’s Jackie, about one of the greatest icons of the 20th Century. It stars Natalie Portman as first lady Jackie Kennedy and is set in the immediate aftermath of the Kennedy assassination. That’s followed by Neruda, which focuses on the life of Pablo Neruda, one of the greatest poets of the 20th Century. Neruda is Chile’s Oscar submission, and Jackie, Larrain’s first English-language film, is also getting a lot of Oscar and awards season buzz.

I talked to Larraín about making the films and his workflow.

Why make back-to-back films?
I never planned it this way. I was going to make Neruda, and then we had to push it six months for a lot of reasons. My last film, The Club, won an award at Berlin, and Darren Aronofsky headed up the jury and asked me to direct Jackie, which he produced. So I ended up doing Jackie right after Neruda.

So what does a Chilean director shooting in Paris bring to such an iconic American subject?
The view of an outsider, maybe. We were doing a lot of post on Neruda in Paris, and the film was mainly made and cut there at Film Factory. Natalie was also living there, so it all came together organically. We built all the interiors there — the White House and so on.

Jackie

Neither film is your run-of-the-mill biopic. Can you talk about Jackie, which has a lot of time compression, random memories and flashbacks?
I don’t like normal biopics. They’re very tricky to do, I think. More than anything we wanted to find and discover the specific sensibility that was Jackie and examine all the events that happened after the assassination. It was also about capturing specific emotions and showing her strengths and weaknesses, and all the paradoxes and controversies that surrounded her. So we approached it from fiction. Good biopics aren’t really biographical; they just try to capture a sense of the person more through atmosphere and emotions than a linear plot and structure.

You must have done a lot of research?
Extensive — looking at newsreels, interviews, reading books. Before all that, I had a very superficial idea of her as this person who was mainly concerned about clothes and style and furniture. But as I researched her character, I discovered just what an incredible woman she was. And for me, it’s also the story of a mother.

Jackie

What were the main technical challenges of making this?
The biggest challenge for me was, of course, making my first film in English. It wasn’t easy to do. My other biggest challenge was making a film about a woman. In my films, the main characters have always been men, so that was the biggest one for me to deal with and understand.

Do you like the post process?
I love it — and more and more, the editing. It’s just so beautiful when you sit with the editor, and every scene you’ve shot is now cut in that first cut. Then you go, “Alright, where do we go now, to really shape the film?” You start moving scenes around and playing with the narrative. I think it was Truffaut who said that when you shoot, you have to fight with the script, and then when you edit, you have to fight with the shoot, and it’s so true. I’ve learned over the years to really embrace post and editing.

You worked with editor Sebastián Sepúlveda on Jackie. Tell us about that relationship and how it worked.
He began cutting while we were shooting, and when we wrapped we finished cutting it at Primo Solido, in Santiago, Chile. We did all the pre-mixes there too.

This is obviously not a VFX-driven piece, but as with any period piece the VFX play a big role.
Absolutely, and Garage, a VFX company in Santiago, did about 80 percent of them. They did a great job. We also used Mikros and Digital District in Paris. I like working with visual effects when I have to, but I’m not really a greenscreen guy (laughs). Both films were fun to do in terms of the effects work, and you can’t tell that they’re visual effects — all the backgrounds and so on are very photorealistic, and I love that illusion… that magic. Then there’s a lot of work erasing all the modern things and doing all the cleanup. It’s the kind of post work that’s most successful when no one notices it. (Check out our interview with Jackie editor Sebastián Sepúlveda.)

Neruda

Neruda

Let’s talk about Neruda, which is also not a typical biopic, but more of “policier” thriller.
Yes, it’s less about Neruda himself and more about what we call the “Nerudian world.” It’s about what he created and what happened when he went into hiding when the political situation changed in Chile. We created this fictional detective who’s hunting him as a way of exploring his life.

Along with Jackie, he was a real person. Did you feel an extra responsibility in making two films about such icons?
Yes, of course, but if you think about it too much it can just paralyze you. You’re trying to capture a sense of the person, their world, and we shot Neruda in Chile, Buenos Aires and a little bit in Paris.

What did you shoot the films on?
We shot Jackie on film and on Super 16, and Neruda on Red. I still love shooting on film more than digital, but we had a great experience with the Red cameras and we used some old Soviet anamorphic lenses from the ‘60s that I found in LA about eight years ago. We got a beautiful look with them. Then we did all the editing in Paris with Hervé Schneid but with a little help at the end from Sebastián Sepúlveda to finish it in time for its Cannes debut. We changed quite a few things — especially the music.

Neruda

Can you talk about the importance of music and sound in both of the films?
Well, film is an audio-visual medium, so sound is half the movie. It triggers mood, emotion, atmosphere, so it’s crucial to the image you’re looking at, and I spend a lot of time working on the music and sound with my team — I love that part of post too. When I work with my editors, I always ask them to cut to sound and work with sound as well, even if they don’t like to work that way.

How is the movie industry in Chile?
I think it’s healthy, and people are always challenging themselves, especially the younger generation. It’s full of great documentaries — and people who’ve never worked with film, only digital. It’s exciting.

What’s next?
I don’t quite know, but I’m developing several projects. It’s whatever happens first.


Industry insider Iain Blair has been interviewing the biggest directors in Hollywood and around the world for years. He is a regular contributor to Variety and has written for such outlets as Reuters, The Chicago Tribune, The Los Angeles Times and the Boston Globe.

The A-List: ‘The Danish Girl’ director Tom Hooper

This relatively low-budget film is generating a ton of Oscar buzz

By Iain Blair

British director Tom Hooper and The King’s Speech — his film about the true-life story of the stuttering King George VI and his Aussie speech therapist — swept the Oscars in 2011, with the film winning him Best Director, along with Best Picture and a Best Actor Oscar for Colin Firth. Now the Oxford-educated Hooper, who got his start shooting commercials and such hit TV shows as Prime Suspect, East-Enders, Elizabeth I and John Adams, and whose film credits include Les Misérables and Red Dust, is getting more Oscar buzz for his latest movie The Danish Girl.

Tom Hooper and Iain Blair

Tom Hooper and Iain Blair

Starring Oscar-winner Eddie Redmayne (The Theory of Everything), The Danish Girl, from Focus Features, tells another real-life story, this time of Lili Elbe, a Danish man who transitioned to a female in the 1920s with the help of his artist wife, played by Alicia Vikander.

I recently spoke with Hooper over lunch about making the film, which was shot with a Red Epic Dragon, and edited on a Media Composer.

Transgender issues are suddenly very much in the zeitgeist, but you must have started working on this quite a while ago?
Yes, and it’s been a long journey, and a real labor of love. I fell in love with the script seven years ago, but it was very hard to finance and risky to do. In fact, a lot of people close to me advised me not to try and make it. But here we are, and I’ll be speaking at The White House on a panel about the film and these issues. So a lot has changed since 2008, and now it’s being embraced, so it’s pretty amazing.

Is it true you first gave Eddie the script over the barricades while you were shooting Les Misérables?
It’s true. I slipped it to him and he called the next day and said, “Yes, let’s go,” and I had to tell him to hold on, that it’s not that easy… we’ve still got to pull it all together.

What did Eddie and Alicia bring to the mix?
They’re both actors with a lot of unusual qualities. Eddie has this emotional openness; an emotional translucency that allows audiences to find it very easy to identify with him, which was key for the role. I first saw that in him when I cast him in Elizabeth 1.

Alicia has so much heart, and is so kind and compassionate, and she brings this inner strength to the role. You never think of her character as the victim. She also makes goodness very interesting, which is incredibly hard to do. It’s far easier to play a villain.

Once again you worked with DP Danny Cohen, who shot The King’s Speech for you. He’s quite a maverick, isn’t he?
That’s exactly the right word. He’s a bit of a rebel — he doesn’t mind breaking the rules — and he doesn’t get attached to a certain formula or way of doing things. This is our fifth film together, and I really feel he’s helped loosen up my style and not feel so bound by all the usual rules. He used some beautiful old lenses and very soft lighting inspired by several Danish artists, and I think the film looks perfect for the story and the period. He’s also the nicest guy in the world.

Tell us about working with editor Melanie Oliver, who cut Les Misérables, The Damned United and several of your TV series. How does that relationship work?
This is our sixth film together, and she did amazing work on the John Adams miniseries. She is a really gifted editor. Basically, she’s my greatest secret weapon, my great collaborator, and she functions almost like a co-director. I really feel that editors are often under-appreciated in that regard, and I rarely change a performance take once she’s selected it and cut it in, as she’s completely right about 90 percent of the time in her first assembly.

B115_C002_0304UA

Performance and editing are like choreography, and they have to go together perfectly like a very intricate dance. If the editor picks the right moments, it can really elevate an actor’s performance, and then the whole film, and she does that all the time.

Where did you do the post? How long was the process?
It was all done in London at Goldcrest, where I usually do post, and then we did all the sound mixing at Halo, all over a period of several months. I love post and the calm after the storm of the shoot where you feel the meter ticking away every minute on set.

For me, the most interesting aspect of it is that, however clear the vision you had of the film before you began, once you sit down in the editing room and start working on, it begins to change into something different. You have to let go of that vision and just look at what’s in front of you, and then it’s all about servicing what the film’s become, and how you can get the best out of what you shot. I love getting the structure right and then the pacing and all the rhythms right — on this we ultimately ended up losing over an hour of material. You hate to cut sceDanishGirl_11447188149nes, but that really tightened it all up.

What about the music and sound? Were they more crucial than usual?
I think so. The next big thing for me in post after editing is adding all the music and sound, and composer Alexandre Desplat responded so well to all the changes. In this film the music acts like the narrator, so we had to be very careful in how we used it. Alexandre went through so many drafts of key scenes where you need to balance the pain and the joy that Eddie’s character is feeling.

Music and sound are always huge for me, but they were even more crucial in this, and a very big challenge, because it’s such a quiet movie. So all the sound effects had to be really effective and just right. I had a great sound team, including Mike Prestwood Smith, our re-recording mixer who did Captain Phillips and Mission Impossible, and we worked hard at getting stuff like the sound of the canals and boats rubbing together exactly right.

Then I love starting to show the film to get a feeling about all that. I always start off showing it to my family first, and then to close friends, and you see how it plays and you learn about it and gradually shape it, and hopefully all the pieces of the puzzle fall into shape by the end of post, and your movie emerges.

CC23_SG03_012541447188143 A043_C002_02140T

Any period piece needs some VFX work. Who did the shots?
There were very few, and they were all done by Double Negative, who I worked with on Les Mis, and they did an amazing job considering the circumstances. This was a very low-budget movie — just about $15 million — and that meant we only had $100,000 for the entire VFX, which isn’t very much. We did need some key VFX shots, such as the shot of the trees at the beginning, and the train on the bridge, which was all CGI. Then there’s a lot of subtle stuff and clean-up work, and colorist Adam Glasman did the DI.

You’ve won an Oscar. How important are they and all the other awards?
I think they really can help with a small film like this. Look what happened with The King’s Speech. I still pinch myself that it did so well and that I won an Oscar.

Where do you keep it?
I know a lot of Brits keep it in the loo, but I keep mine on the mantle by the fireplace

Industry insider Iain Blair has been interviewing the biggest directors in Hollywood and around the world for years. He is a regular contributor to Variety and has written for such outlets as Reuters, The Chicago Tribune, The Los Angeles Times and the Boston Globe.

 

Oscar-winner Ben Wilkins on Whiplash’s audio mix, edit

This BAFTA- and Oscar-winner walks us through his process.

By Randi Altman

When I first spoke with Ben Wilkins, he was freshly back from the Oscar-nominee luncheon in Hollywood and about to head to his native England to attend the BAFTAs. Wilkins was nominated by both academies for his post sound work on Sony Picture Classics’ Whiplash, the Damien Chazelle-directed film about an aspiring jazz drummer and his brutal instructor.

Wilkins (@tonkasound) didn’t return to LA empty handed — he, along with fellow sound re- Continue reading